LA market file Rank #815
Lagrange
Today, Lagrange has expanded its ZK Prover Network to power proof generation for ZK rollups, adding onto Lagrange’s existing ZK Coprocessor and State Committee offerings.
- Market cap
- $21.28M
- Rank
- #815
- Volume (24h)
- $5.72M26.9% of cap
- Circulating supply
- 357.17MLA
- Fully diluted value
- $59.57M
PRICE HISTORY
Lagrange price chart
MODEL SCENARIOS
Lagrange price prediction
How far Lagrange could move over the coming weeks and months, read from its own past year of daily moves, with the evidence behind each range. Recomputed daily.
Computing Lagrange’s price paths…
MARKET SIGNAL
Why Lagrange reads bearish
Momentum supports the reading: 5 of 5 windows, 30-day move weighted highest. The evidence below produces a bearish reading of current conditions, not a price forecast.
Score drivers i
- Momentum55% weight-10.1 pts
- Historical position20% weight-8.4 pts
- Milestone recency15% weight-4.9 pts
- Volume confirmation10% weight+5 pts
Historical position i
8% of the way from the all-time low to the high, on a log scale.
Momentum evidence i
- 24h
- +2.85%
- 7d
- +2.34%
- 30d
- -14.32% Highest weight
- 200d
- -64.16%
- 1y
- -84.96%
Market context · not scored
- Volume (24h)
- $5.72M
- Turnover
- 26.88%
- Rank
- #815
- Circulating supply
- 357.17M
How this score is calculated Model v1.0
The score starts at a neutral 50 and adds four bounded drivers. Momentum (55%) blends the 24h, 7d, 30d, 200d and 1y moves; each passes through a saturating curve (tanh of the move over a per-window scale of 5, 12, 25, 50 and 80 points) and is weighted 10, 20, 40, 20 and 10 percent. Historical position (20%) maps the log-scale position between the all-time low and high onto −10 to +10 points. Milestone recency (15%) adds up to 7.5 points for an all-time high inside the past 30, 90 or 365 days and subtracts the same for a recent low. Volume confirmation (10%) adds up to 5 points in the direction of the day’s move once 24h turnover exceeds 2% of market value, saturating at 10%.
Readings of 60 or more are labelled bullish, 40 or less bearish. Missing inputs contribute zero and lower the reported data coverage instead of being guessed.
TODAY’S TRADING
Lagrange market analysis
Price movement i
77% of the way from the day's low to its high · 5.61% range width
- 1h
- -1.28%
- 24h
- +2.85%
- 7d
- +2.34%
- 30d
- -14.32%
- 200d
- -64.16%
- 1y
- -84.96%
Trading activity is active i
- Turnover
- 26.88%24h volume ÷ market cap. Above 8% reads as active, below 2% as quiet.
- 24h range
- 5.61%High minus low as a share of the current price.
- Range position
- 77%0% is the day's low, 100% the high.
Volume is reported activity, not order-book liquidity. These figures describe observations, not a recommendation.
What if the price moves?
Change per LA: $0.005964. A calculation, not a prediction.
WHERE IT TRADES
Lagrange markets
Exchange pairs reported by CoinGecko. Venues that are unrated, stale, anomalous or wide-spread stay hidden until you ask for them.
Loading exchange pairs…
FOLLOW THE STORY
Lagrange news & coverage
Reporting that mentions Lagrange, with the original publisher identified.
No recent stories mention Lagrange. Coverage refreshes every few minutes.
Explore the latest crypto newsTHE BASICS
About Lagrange
Today, Lagrange has expanded its ZK Prover Network to power proof generation for ZK rollups, adding onto Lagrange’s existing ZK Coprocessor and State Committee offerings. With this new addition, Lagrange now unlocks proofs for anything – for rollups, apps, coprocessors and interoperability – as an infinite proving layer that enables anyone to prove everything at internet scale. Previously, Lagrange launched the first production-ready ZK prover network in the industry, operated by top operators including Coinbase, Kraken, OKX and more.
Now, Lagrange’s ZK Prover Network is expanding to address key challenges faced by rollups and advance ZK adoption and utility. The ZK Coprocessor can generate a proof of correct computation over arbitrary storage slots for arbitrary block ranges. For example, consider an application that wishes to compute the average on Ethereum for ETH / USDC pricing. A developer must first specify the memory slots and block range (~50,400) that they are interested in including in the data set.
Next the developer writes the computations that is to be executed across the storage slots over the different blocks in parallel. Once the proof is generated, it will prove both the storage inclusion and the aggregated computation as valid with respect to a block header derived from smart contract information.
Lagrange price today
| Lagrange price | $0.0596 |
|---|---|
| 24h change | +2.85% |
| 24h low / high | $0.0571 / $0.0604 |
| Market cap | $21.28M |
| Market cap rank | #815 |
| 24h volume | $5.72M |
| Circulating supply | 357.17M LA |
| Total supply | 1B LA |
| Maximum supply | No hard cap |
| Fully diluted value | $59.57M |
| All-time high | $1.72 · June 5, 2025 |
| All-time low | $0.0443 · August 5, 2026 |
What determines Lagrange's market capitalisation?
Market cap is the latest price ($0.0596) multiplied by the circulating supply (357.17M LA). It measures the value of units in circulation, not money invested.
Why can LA prices differ between exchanges?
Each venue has its own order book, fees and liquidity. Prices converge through arbitrage but can differ by the spread, especially on smaller venues. The markets section lists reliable venues first.
How fresh is this data?
Prices come from CoinGecko and refresh about every minute; each figure shows its source and when it was read. If the provider is unavailable, the page says so rather than showing a stale or invented number.
COMPARE
Compare Lagrange
Side by side with the largest assets: size, returns, supply and distance from all-time high.
How to read this market file
Prices, capitalization and volume come from the displayed CoinGecko snapshot. Market capitalization and exchange volume describe different measures; neither is available liquidity for an order. Missing measurements remain blank. The chart opens the exact asset ID: lagrange.
Data sources and editorial standards →